What is David Lowenthal's position on heritage?

David Lowenthal posits that heritage represents an idealized version of history, emphasizing how people often select and interpret aspects of the past to construct a narrative that aligns with contemporary values or identities. This perspective draws attention to the fact that heritage is not always an objective or factual account of historical events; instead, it is often shaped and molded to fit present-day perspectives, aspirations, or political agendas. By highlighting this idealization, Lowenthal invites critical reflection on how societies commemorate their pasts and the implications that arise from such representations on collective memory and identity.

The other options do not fully encapsulate Lowenthal's views. For instance, the notion that heritage is an accurate reflection of the past overlooks the complex, selective nature of memory and historical narrative that he critiques. Similarly, the idea that heritage is irrelevant to modern society disregards the significant role that heritage plays in shaping cultural identity and public life. Lastly, claiming that heritage should only concern tangible artifacts misses the broader definition that includes traditions, narratives, and values embodied in intangible forms, which are also significant in understanding cultural heritage.